Monday, March 03, 2008

Facets Post

Here are the films Liz and I have seen lately:
Eastern Promises
Thank You for Smoking
3:10 to Yuma (2007)
Mountain Patrol
Wedding Crashers
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

Saturday, November 03, 2007

New Orleans Day 2

I sit at a small table at the St. Charles Guest House on the edge of the Garden District as the sun rises on my third day in New Orleans.

Today we will work again in the Lower Ninth Ward, the most affected area of a city devastated by Hurricane Katrina.

Here's a video of the Lower Ninth.


Yesterday morning after eating breakfast, the group of us staying at the St. Charles Guest House, were picked up by the Japanese Consulate driver, and brought to the house of Emily, the coordinator of this trip.





There we met the volunteer coordinator for Lean on Me, the non-profit we are working with. Her name was the same of the storm, Katrina. Prior to the Hurricane, she ran a non-profit that aided the homeless in California. When Katrina struck, her husband said that since dealing with the homeless was what they knew how to do, it was time for them to expand their operations. Now Katrina jets back and forth between Sacramento and New Orleans to oversee operations.

With her we traveled to the Ninth. During the trip, Emily remembered that we needed ice and called from the other car to request that we stop. Katrina said to tell her that we would definitely stop, but to follow her cause she knew a place we could stop later.

She explained that because different areas of the city had been affected to greater or lesser extents, it was vital to spend money in areas of the greatest need.

(to be continued)

Friday, November 02, 2007

New Orleans

お早うございます!今朝ニューオーラーンズからBlogします。長くて忙しい週の間に飛行機に乗ってJETAAのボランティア研修に参加させてくれます。昨日の四時ごろ着いて空港で他のJETAA人に会いました。アジア系アメリカ人がかなり多いです。皆が着いたら、空港からSt. Charles旅館へ日本国総領事館人に連れてくれました。

荷物を出し、Check-inしたら、EMILYという総領事館人のお宅で晩御飯を一緒に食べました。彼女はガンボーとパンプリンを作ってくれました。何より美味しいかったです。他の研修員は珍しい人ばかりです。二人はボストン人、一人ニューヨーク人、シアン入れて二人シカゴ人、もちろんニューオーレーンズ人が多いです。日本語レベルはかなり高いですが鼻高まる奴は全然いないので、誰も日本語で話していません。少し残念だと気がします。

晩御飯が終わったら、旅行で連れて寝たがっている人数が多かったです。一人ニューオーレーンズJETAA方はシアン達を見送ってくれました。眠くなかったから、彼はニューオーレーンズの大事なところをふらふらドライブで見せてくれました。台風で台無しされたところは結構蘇りました。

しかし、今日一番酷く台風に影響されたところに行ってボランティアすることになりました。頑張ろうね!

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Florida city ponders banning China

This Florida mayor thought it'd be a clever idea to ban all products from China. As Angry Asian Man points out, he's restricting it to goods $49 and up. Normally, I'd be like this is completely unfounded and racist and blah blah blah, but I don't know. This could be a big thing.

After all, it'd be kind of funny to see a xenophobic Florida revert back to pre-tool civilization for a little while and not have to feel guilty about delighting in it.

We might not know it, but we need them more than they need us...

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

U.S. Contractor Kidnaps Workers to Bulid Embassy

A U.S. contracted company told Filipino workers that they could have jobs at hotels in Dubai. They soon found themselves on a plane to Iraq, and didn't find out the switch until the captain announced their destination...

Another triumph for private contracting. I guess folks are right about it keeping labor costs down.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Borat

I still haven't seen Borat, and I'm not really sure I want to. I respect Sasha Cohen's satirical skills more than her skating, but I've never been too big on laughing at others' expense.

So what if you absolutely loved the film and hyped it to your friends? What if you were at least partly to blame for every Kazakhstanian in the country having to listen to the same ignorant "clever" questions endlessly everyday? Hate telemarketers? What if the telemarketers insulted your place of birth everytime they called?

For your penance, try reading this article:
Student from Kazakhstan dispels 'Borat' myths
and definitely go see "Nomad", which is now out in theatres and features a mixed cast of Kazaks and others including one of the greatest actors in American cinematic history, Jason Scott Lee.

As many of you know, Lee quit acting to become a subsistance farmer in Volcano, Hawaii. He recently closed his home theatre (not a home theater, but an actual public playhouse on his property!!) in order to fully pursue his environmental projects.

To learn more about Lee's projects, check out his farm's homepage:
PuMu

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Once the Asians Departed, the film won best picture

Inferior Remake Wins Best Picture with White Actors

From what I hear, since my time on Earth is limited and I would rather be kicked in the head by the undead corpse of Barbaro than spend my time watching the Oscars, "The Departed" aka "White Infernal Affairs with White Racist Actors" won Best Picture.

At the Oscars, the film was described as "based on a Japanese film". That's right, they borrowed the greatest cop thriller in human history, produced in the world's capital for amazing cop thrillers, and couldn't even fucking figure out which country it came from? They took the world's greatest cop thriller but had to refilm it because the American public wouldn't appreciate the color of the incredible actors' skin? Moreover, they replaced one of the finest acting performances in the history of cinema with an actor who has a history of racist violence against people of color, including those of Asian descent.

From ABC.com:

He harassed a group of African American school kids with racist epithets, and when he was 16, again using racist language, he attacked a middle-aged Vietnamese man and left the man blind in one eye. Wahlberg was arrested for attempted murder, plead guilty to assault, and spent 45 days in jail.

And though the right thing to do would be to try to find the man and make amends, Wahlberg says, he admits he hasn't done so — but says he's no longer burdened by guilt.

And why the fuck would he be burdened by guilt? I mean the guy he attacked for being Asian probably has grown a new eye by now, right? Or maybe he's actually Forest Whitaker, one of the few people with a more successful acting character than Marky Mark Asian-Basher" Wahlberg.

But more than invective for Wahlberg, I want to point the figure at the media community we've created again. What does it say about us that they believe we would be more likely to go see an inferior film starring someone who beat someone within an inch of their life out of racial hatred than a superior film featuring something much worse: Some "slanty-eyed gooks" (Wahlberg's own words)?

I say we do find Emmett Till's killers and bring them to justice by nominating them for an Academy Award. Maybe they can star in the remake of "Raisin in the Sun".

What's wrong with "Gay=Asian"?

Epic Asian American community blogger/news service Angry Asian Man (AAM) links another racist incident at an Ivy League school here: Graffiti Found in Blair Hall.

The messages (one of which is captured in the accompanying photograph) "Dry Dorms=Gay" and "Dry Dorms are for Asians", were written as attacks on alcohol-free dorms at the institution.

Often when an incident of this variety occurs, the reactions are polar: "What is this racist/bigoted crap?" and "What's the big deal?"

The perspective gap that exists between the two responses is in many ways the very problem--it's less the actual incident and more the fact that many people, some with considerable power in society equate certain ethnic backgrounds or sexual orientations with a negative connotation. That's something that should be upsetting not only to members of those groups, but anyone who believes in the marketplace of ideas that is supposed to dictate our social discourse. When people are seen with a negative connotation before we even approach their individual character, it points to difficulties in our ability to create a merit-based society.

That's not to say that such speech should be censored. If those sentiments exist--whether they be with intentional malice or not--they ought to be voiced, as only with thoughtful discourse will our society and its understanding of these issues deepen.

But the strange dynamic of this era sees "anti-PC" people attempt to destroy this dynamic while masquerading as crusaders for free-speech. While everyone should have the right to voice their opinions--no matter how racist or bigoted--why do many "anti-PC" folks believe that they should be allowed to both speak their own ideas and be free from any critique or response from those who disagree? In a true marketplace of ideas, there is no place for speech protected from criticism. Why, of any speech, would people choose to spend their energy attempting to deny speech rights to those who wish defend themselves from what they see as bigoted ideas?

But there is another issue involved with the Princeton incident which is also similar to the 2004 Details Magazine "Gay or Asian" incident. There is a clear equation of "Gayness" and "Asianness". Many apologists responded by saying, "What's wrong with that? Do you hate gay people or Asian people?" AAM addresses this well:

The graffiti, written on a whiteboard and a wall in blue dry-erase marker, read "Dry Dorms = Gay" and "Dry dorms are for Asians." That's racist! And you know why? It equates Asians with inherently being undesirable losers. Because it definitely doesn't intend to mean "Dry dorms are for cool people."

He is discussing what is wrong with the equation of not drinking with being Asian, but the same principle applies. Words do not have some universal meaning, no matter what self-absorbed fools who wack-off to Webster's might insist. This is no-brainer. In the same way some might call their best friend an "Asshole" but probably wouldn't call a stranger walking down the street with a sledgehammer the same, context and intent matters.

Being upset has nothing to do with hating Asians or homosexuals. It has everything to do with being angered by hatred directed at either group. Members of Gay Asian & Pacific Islander Men of New York (GAPIMNY) explain here: Details Says "Gay or Asian". We Say Gay AND Asian.

At GAPIMNY, we were outraged by Details Magazine's "Gay or Asian?" feature. In it, writer Whitney McNally revived a history of stereotypical images of LGBT API peoples and thinly veiled racism, homophobia, and classism as humor.

So why does the "anti-PC movement" exist? Why would well-meaning people want to attack minority groups' opportunity to speak against bigoted speech?

My guess is "history". Historically, majority power groups have enjoyed the ability to denigrate others with impunity. Naturally, it would be a culture shock to wake up one morning and find that this cowardly way of artificially boosting one's lacking self-esteem is no longer received positively by large section of society. Think empathetically for a moment: You are unsatisfied with yourself for a moment, so you attack a minority group in a way that has always in the past gotten a laugh and little bit of positive attention, and suddenly you find yourself being attacked instead.

I can understand why it's so upsetting and disorienting for aversive racists, sexists and homophobes. Their world is truly falling to pieces. That's not to say we ought to humor them--their destructive values must be tested in the marketplace of ideas and ultimately they will fail the test.

But we have the ability to show empathy, even when we do not receive it. Let's demonstrate that ability.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Chicago Politics

Daley won :(
I had another marathon day on Tuesday--a full five-class day plus two and a half hours of night school teaching. So I decided to vote before school when the polls opened at six. I never received a polling place notification card, and a lot of the locations have changed lately in Chicago, so I was a little worried. I ended up finding my place through the Channel 5 NBC webpage, and as luck would have it, it was the same place as last time.

When I got to the polling place, it was nearly empty, so the judges were just sitting around munching on some of the food. I went up to vote and was offered a paper ballot. It had a different system from the normal ballot, so one of the judges demonstrated how to vote to me.

"Here--if you want to vote for Mayor Daley, just connect this arrow here..."

Really, I'm not kidding. It reminded me of when I voted at the Champaign County Clerk's Office for the 2004 election and was told, "To vote for the President, punch here".

So I voted for Brown, Morfin (who was opposing Daley's crony, Solis) and some random person for the other office, and went on my way to work.

I got through the day and was supposed to meet before night school with my Japanese Club, but there was an emergency faculty meeting. One of our colleagues had been killed in her home. It was crushing--she was an incredible teacher and later, as the kids found out, everyone was pretty distraught. I didn't really know her, but I could feel the pain in the community.

Today I worked through until ten as I had after-school tutoring in the North suburbs. When I got home, my voter notification card had just arrived in the mail today.

I don't know. These are weird topics to tie together, but I'm just kind of writing to purge right now. I hope someone gets something out of it.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

No Surprises

This AP article describes a study which investigated the role of skin tone in earnings of recent immigrants. Researchers controlled for educational background, skills, race or nationality and other factors.

I have no doubt some who absolutely love prejudice or at least are too scared to consider the possibility that it is still an integral part of our social institutions will dismiss this information by saying, "I knew some guy once, who was blacker than the ace of spades who made a lot of money!"

You are free to your own beliefs, but I would encourage people to ask themselves, "Which is a more compelling argument? One I agree with that is anecdotal or just something I made of, or one that is based on a research study that people invested considerable time into making it accurate and significant?"

Anyway, I'm going to go eat some breakfast that my skin tone privilege helped purchase. Peace out.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Movies We Saw in 2006 (Part 1)

Lately, I've been talking to a student who attends the only non-Japanese class in my room. Her World Studies class was added 2/3 of the way through the semester--all the students were taking out of their other sections and put in a new section with a new teacher.

This student is passionate about film. She's like an encyclopedia of art house and international film. While the other students are raving about the latest blaxplotation flick, she's all, "Audition, you seen that? Wow, that was crazy. I like different movies, but that was too much!"

So in tribute to all the Roger Ebert's of the inner-city, here's my "watched in 2006" movie list:
Please comment or mail me questions about any of the films. I hope that you will find old favorites and new treasures from this list. Since it's quite extensive, I'll break it up among several posts.

Also, to remind you the vast diversity of perspectives on film, and also how far we have yet to go on issues of equality and empathy in this society, I'll link the gospelcom.net reviews for each movie that has one.

1. Whale Rider--The feminist real-life fairy tale that crosses many gender and ethnicity barriers. Beautifully shot and an amazing debut by Keisha Castle-Hughes, who has now played the leader of the Maori and the Mother of God.
2. Maria, Full of Grace--Empathetic, but difficult to watch drama about "mules", young women drafted to smuggle drugs across the border.
3. Love Liza--MOST. DEPRESSING. FILM. EVER. Yeah, Philip Seymour Hoffman is an awesome actor, but we already knew that. Do we have to sit through two hours of life abusing him to realize that?
4. Cidade de Deus (City of God)--Gritty look at the child gangs who populate the underbelly of Rio. The narrator is so charismatic as to bring shine to sobering darkness of the environment. Also, the film box picture ranks among one of the most misleading in the history of the world. I remember the scene from the box well, but several of my friends who saw the film were like, "When the fuck was that? Was that even in the movie?" Yeah, but barely. I guess we know how much thought film marketers put into box art: "Half-naked kids on the beach? Sounds like a hit!!!"
http://preview.gospelcom.net/rev.php3?2360

5. Unbreakable--Second time I saw this, but I wanted to give Liz a chance to see it since she admires Samuel L. I know that M. Night has fallen out of favor, and this is not one of his favorites, but I thought this was probably his best when combining the obvious love his has for his subject and Samuel L's acting. Superior in my opinion to "Sixth Sense" which I thought was pretty good, but saw it in Japan and found "the twist" to be too predictable.
http://preview.gospelcom.net/rev.php3?1777
6. Ghost World--This movie totally stumped me. I had heard all of the rave reviews for it as a great American movie classic and so I'm left with this burning question: Does this film make me want to punch myself in the head due to its overratedness or is it really all that irritating all on its own? It kind of reminded me of Kevin Smith's "Dogma". It's true that adolescents have to deal with being angsty, hipster and smarter than people give them credit for, but that doesn't mean that it's brilliant to point that out for the billionth time. Finally, what the fuck is up with Scarlett Johansson? How much acting ability does it take for a charisma-less personification of vapidness to play a charisma-less personification of vapidness in every single movie? Moreover, in what way is that "hot"??!? Does it have something to do with her octagenarian smoker's voice or is it her strangle preportioned face? Maybe it is every man's secret desire to lust after the one person in the world who they can confirm is actually even less capable of simple social interaction than they are? All that said, Liz and I loved this film. She still turns to me occasionally and in her best Scarlett/James Earl Jones bass says, "I'm Scarlett Johansson, aren't I pretty?" and we bust out laughing...
http://preview.gospelcom.net/rev.php3?1910
7. The Village--Another M. Night movie that people reacted negatively to. I thought it featured beautiful imagery and brought up some interesting moral dillemas. In an industry full of recycled plot-lines and recycled actors, I thought he put together a good story and strong cast. Not great, but decent.
http://preview.gospelcom.net/rev.php3?2621
8. Office Space--Only funny because it's true. The copier death scene is something worth reliving again and again, and certainly a secret wish of the drunkest person at Liz and I's wedding. When I was a kid, the rest of the Asian and white kids at my high school and I really did listen to Geto Boys all the time and think we were hard while we were copying each other's Calculus homework...
http://preview.gospelcom.net/rev.php3?101
9. Violent Cop--One of Beat Takeshi Kitano's earlier films. It's often compared to "Dirty Harry". I don't remember much about this film. I think it's mostly because there was little to remember. Lots of action; lots of corpses; some exploitation of women. Violence begats violence. It's useful mostly as a way to chart Kitano's development as an actor/director.
10. Monsoon Wedding--In terms of Mira Nair's short and narrow directing resume, we can only hope it is due to her picking and choosing her projects rather than the ugly filmmaking reality of institutional racism. Over the last three decades, she has done a movie every several years, with a number of truly standout pictures. Monsoon Wedding is one of her best. In general, the genre of American films with so-called "exotic" locales is an ugly, jingoist one. But Nair's pictures are always labors of love in which she delicately balances the novelty of cultural difference with warm central themes of shared humanity. It is easy to love and understand her main characters as we learn from them--they are not specimen to be studied, but friends to embrace and understand.
http://preview.gospelcom.net/rev.php3?2033

If you want to see more comments from a labor of love--a relatively comprehensive movie review database put together by a bunch of people who think that the mere discussion of homosexuality is an abomination, and that it's worth counting the exact number of times people use marginal profanity and that the destruction of a copy machine is "violence", please consult:
http://preview.gospelcom.net/search.html

Saturday, January 13, 2007

"Don't take a bullet for us"

Yesterday was probably the most challenging day I've had at my school since I started last September.

It's been a busy week which left very little time for sleep. I had Students for Social Justice and union meetings two days this week, so I hadn't been getting home until 9ish when I'd eat my first real meal of the day, spend some time with the wife and then get a little rest before I got up at 5 the next day (although I fell a asleep a couple times during planning so I probably wasn't fully awake until around 6 am).

Thursday night I had to drive up to tutor a student who goes to a famous high school in the North Suburbs. She's an extraordinary kid--very thoughtful for her age or any age, and it helps me to get some one-on-one teaching time. Strangely enough, I tutor her in mathematics--not my area of certification. It works out better than usual though since we just sit down and derive the formulas together, which, scandalously enough doesn't seem to be part of the curriculum any more.

To be straight-up honest and rude, they sorely underpay me. It doesn't really bother me--if I had a problem with it, I wouldn't do it--it's just a fact I thought I'd throw in there. One of the reasons I enjoy it so much though is that it gives me an excuse to visit with my cousin--a truly remarkable person who really will improve you just by sitting with you for a few minutes. He might read this and I don't want to hurt him, but I think the best description of him is someone who is pretty much the best in the world at anything he tries but just has a blockage when it comes to employment because he expects more of himself than any of his currently available options.

I want to help, but it changes from day-to-day, and I'm not sure where he needs help. (We all need help.) He survives fine--basically hustling large-corporations and doing little odd jobs and schemes to feed himself. So I'm not sure whether he needs help getting over his blockage to get a "real" job or he just needs to learn to be proud of himself whatever he chooses to spend his time with. Probably a bit of both.

It just kills me sometimes that he isn't teaching (he was a great teacher for a year), practicing law (has a degree), photographing (in the short time he did that he won a city competition) or any of the other dozens of things he's tried and mastered and then moved on to something else. I find myself wanting to shake him sometimes and say, "Why not just share one of your gifts whether you like it or not until you figure out what you do want to do?"

But that probably would just upset him and I really love our time together.

So I got home after midnight, my wife talked to me a bit in a half-asleep state until about two-ish, I got up at five, took a shower and drove to work.

Now, it's just my first year, but I've got my own room and the kids have figured out I'm someone they can be straight up with so I get to tap into the SCN (student communication network) . The SCN is not very high-tech, but it has been in existence in every school in the history of the world and it just consists of kids relaying information to each other in the halls, on their lunch, and most importantly in the middle of class when they really should be learning some math, history, English, or Japanese. It's a trade-off, as a teacher in order to be part of the SCN, you can't share everything you hear with the administration, but on the flipside, you are privvy to information which could protect yourself, and more importantly your students.

At a school like mine, where the faculty numbers over one-hundred, and one often doesn't hear about even the official events before the minute they are supposed to be underway, the SCN is the difference between you standing there clueless and being able to get your kids safely to where you are supposed to be. Whether it be a schedule change, early dismissal, a gang conflict or an assembly, my students know it before I do, and I know it before most of the rest of the staff does.

The day before, on Thursday, there had been a major fight on the third floor, where a couple of the lunchrooms and about half of the lockers are. My rumor-based understanding is that there was a dispute between two young ladies, which resulted in one of the students and nineteen of her friends attacking the other student. That student made a very good immediate decision and a poor subsequent decision.

The first decision is something you might find useful if you are ever attacked by twenty other people. In this situation, she curled up into a ball, and protected her face and body with her arms and legs. This allowed her to escape with some cuts and deep bruises but little in the way of serious damage.

You might ask yourself at this time, "Where were the teachers in this situation?" I can't be sure, as I wasn't there--perhaps there was a faculty member or two putting themselves in harm's way to attempt to defuse the situation. There's no way to know for sure; one or two faculty can do little to remove twenty students from one other student. I'm not sure even how the fight ended. Did the large group tire or feel a pang of conscience or did the little security staff that the school can afford eventually arrive and break up the altercation?

Perhaps you might judge harshly any faculty members who stand idly by while students bloody each other. Please don't. The union itself advised new members in its board sanctioned new teacher training, "No matter what you might want to do, you must not lay a hand on any kid. Such intervention may and has in the past resulted in dismissal!" So I can't fault those who protect themselves and their welfare. However, I can't speak for how it must feel inside to have dedicated oneself to a profession of improving the lives of young people and then stand by powerless as they pepper each other with violence.

I can speak for how I have learned to handle fights and other flare-ups in my classroom or the hall around it. I shout, "Ok, I'm walking in the middle and if you continue swinging, you are going to hit me in the head!" and then I walk in the middle of the conflict. It has worked wonders so far. After I had explained my strategy, over the couple of weeks on a couple of occasions my students tested my honesty by beginning what I believe were mock fights in my classroom. When I did indeed shout and walk into the middle of it, a couple of fists narrowly missing my head, they were satisfied.

No fights have broke out in Japanese class since. I expect that it has not only pushed some fights out to non-instructional time, but probably also prevented some. If you have to wait a half-hour to get a hack at someone you are angry at, the anger tends to subside. At least it does unless they and nineteen of their friends got a crack at you.

The second decision the student who was attacked on Thursday made was the common social convention of calling her friends and family and informing them of what happened.

Friday was mayhem. Our security system consists of opening one door and passing kids through a metal detector. A school of 2,000 kids are far smarter than any hastily constructed security system. My students have gotten guns, knives, snakes, cell phones, and a host of other banned items into the building through a number of end arounds the security system. Ok, maybe snakes aren't on the banned list of items, but they did indeed get a snake into the room, upon which we decided to leave our normal homeroom topics and spend a few minutes discussing the life habits of snakes.

Utilizing this knowledge well, a number of students of another school in the area were able to enter the building, at least one with a weapon. I heard many other stories about the exact number of weapons, but again, the SCN is not concern with journalistic integrity (is anyone these days)--it spreads information and quickly.

There were fights all day; by the grace of God, no one was shot, and the administration, understandably went into lockdown mode.

I had had a minor incident with a student earlier in the week who had stepped in dog shit and decided rather than going to the restroom to just scrape it off in my classroom. The other students were miserable, so I wrote him up.

Went I went to speak to the administration about it, however, I felt silly. Who would want to deal with this on a day that hall sweeps were occurring (where any and all students found in the hall were being detained and suspending or arrested). Cops, security and administration were running everywhere and there were lines of dozens of students at every assistant principal's office.

Throughout the day, I had students, some of them the most agreeable people I have ever had the fortune of meeting, entering the classroom with the international face of "I just got harassed by authority for doing nothing wrong" showcased for all to see.

In my fifth period class--often my most challenging--a student finally broke away from our Japanese lesson and asked, "Are you going to hide under the desk if they come up shooting?" I thought for a minute and just said, "Iie, Gakusei-o mamoru-yo. It's my job to put myself in danger to protect students."

"Don't take a bullet for us," she said. I told her I couldn't think of anything better to take a bullet for, but I hope I won't have to.

By the afternoon, the classrooms were almost empty. Japanese, history, English, math, art these are fun subjects and some students stayed for them. Others decided that they are just not worth risking getting shot over.

I don't know that either decision is right, persay. I know teaching people IS something worth getting shot over to me, but perhaps it's not something I've experienced so I'm just being foolhardy, or worse, dishonest with myself.

The next time someone like myself, who received the very best education that money can buy, goes on TV or addresses Congress and says, "If these schools can't get their students to have the same test scores as other schools, they don't deserve funding," please, please remember this story. It is being repeated all over our urban landscape, and let's face it, when you take away opportunities from individuals who had no responsibility for what you are trying to punish, you are accomplishing little more than attacking the ideals of democracy.

My school is full of amazing, dedicated, brilliant students. Students who think critically, and stand up for what they believe in are sprinkled through its halls and classrooms. And yet they are subject to what are often ridiculous conditions and impossible decisions simply because they are poor kids of color and none of them are the kids of the people who make decisions on these issues.

I'm sure your kids are wonderful too. That's a trait pretty typical of human adolescents. But how would they do in this environment and why are they entitled to not be part of it?

Sunday, December 31, 2006

The Main Vein of East Central Illinois Politics

IlliniPundit, a make-shift thinktank site for Champaign County Republicans (not exactly conservatives, although some authentic ones are in attendance), is back with a new look and framework.

IP is clearly a labor of love by its creator, Gordy Hulten. Gordy has poured in tremendous amounts of his own time into building a truly epic blog/forum-ish political site for East Central Illinois.

Gordy also has a good sense of humor, so I hope he won't be offended by a little "something good/something bad" critique.

Good:
1. Updates on the local level: I feel like I can keep track of CU local politics better than the vast majority of citizens of CU by following this blog and filtering it for its right-wing slant. In addition to closely watching the newswire, Gordy and the other contributors have plenty access to insider politics in the area. I sure miss the smell of the boneyard in the morning.
2. Openness to opposing viewpoints: Groupthink is the greatest threat to an online community. IP has plenty of groupthink, but Gordy shows intentional effort to break that down, even though much of it flows in line with his own personal politics. I have experienced some occasional censorship of my political posts on the site, but not from Gordy himself who usually seems more upset about the situation than myself and reminds me to mail him immediately if I experience anything of the sort. There is a small group of posters who seek to stereotype and shout down opposing viewpoints rather than engage the arguments involved, but I suppose that exists on any political site in any part of the spectrum. There's nothing worse than when you need to release some good thought on an issue and you are told to hold it.
3. Activity: IP.com is insanely active with several dozen regular contributors and surely many hundred regular readers. This makes it interesting to read and participate in. It also likely helps the local level of political awareness. The more streams of discourse a site has the bountiful it is.
4. Ease of participation: Anyone, anonymous or otherwise, may response to any post. In two minutes anyone could sign-up for an account and begin posting blog entries. Just whip out your political views and showcase them for all to see.

Problematic:
1. The title: Few words in the English language are more pretentious than "pundit". That a local person would choose "Illini" for part of the title is not particularly surprising. While I empathize and support the Native American empowerment movement, I understand the local pride in the traditional symbol of a white guy in a fake indian suit. But "pundit"??? Hasn't anyone ever heard that "True compentence is its own pubicity"? Calling oneself a "pundit" is no proof of incompetence, but it does beg some questions about security. I guess I'm writing this to the hundreds of other self-proclaimed pundits too. After all, the difference between a "pundit" and "some asshole with an opinion" (yes, yes, everyone's got one) is an uncreative, self-congratulatory title.
2. The tendency to degenerate: Hardly confined to IP, this is a vice of nearly any website that deals with political issues online. There are a few regular posters that don't believe in supporting arguments with evidence. Or empathy. Or math. Or the public good. While not surprising, this can ruin many a good discussion with loud shouts of "you are aiding the enemy" or "you're just a liberal". The sad part is that when people spray these foul-smelling polemic tactics all over the place it is our Marketplace of Ideas that ultimately suffers.
3. The subtitle: Collective Intelligence Interacting Freely
Would you intentionally name your website with the abbreviation "IP" and then add "Freely" into the subtitle?

So I christen Illinipundit.com as "IP Freely".


Wednesday, December 20, 2006

A volunteer military?

Who should make up the armed forces in our country and what role should the educational system play in that decision? Do you really know what NCLB does? Can you be patriotic without being pro-military?

Today was a pretty smooth day by our school's standard. We are still on a shortened bell, extended division (homeroom) schedule, but I had all of my classes today.

Since it's the last week before Winter Vacation (冬休), the kids are pretty restless. I gave back some exams, which I had graded rather leniently and gave the kids free time to work on their final projects.

In the second level course, they are preparing a grant proposal in English and Japanese. It's a wide range of performance--some kids have barely managed the English portion, and are just slapping some translated words into the process. Others are harassing me for new grammar points so they can write a good translation. Regardless, it's a good skill for them to work on--how to put your dreams into words and present them to others.

The first years are working on a picture porfolio introducing themselves and their families in "Amelie" style. Yeah, we actually watched a clip from "Amelie" in Japanese class. But hey, language is just a mask for communication right? So, just like in Amelie, they are to build people's personalities through a series of "She likes/She doesn't like" sentences.

But my most proud moment of the day was when one of my students who isn't actually in any of my classes (she takes French), but is in the room constantly, brought in a rough draft of a presentation I asked her to work on.

You see, my style tends to be to tell a whole bunch of students, "You're bored, why not try this? I think it's something you'd be interested in!" They get enthusiastic, but most of them soon forget--it's hard to follow through on things.

But she came in today and was like, "Yeah, it's kind of short, but I hope it'll be good", so I set it up for her to present to the other students who work in the room after school.

Her presentation was on "The Opt-Out" form for military service. I probably should back up and explain: Under NCLB (No Child Left Behind), every school district must turn over the names, home contact information and other personal information of all of its 10th-12th grade students to military recruiters. Really, I'm not making this up. It's part of the law. Basically, the only way to prevent this from happening is for students or their parents to sign "Opt-out" forms which would remove the student from the list that is being turned over.

So the student went through the details, gave a little too detail, and not enough enthusiasm (I think she was a little nervous), but then went into the question and answer session. And she was incredible. The kids gave her a bunch of tough questions and she had an answer for everything:
Q: What wrong with them calling us?
A: Well, think about this, you have a terrible day, get several failing notices, and get in a fight with your parents, and then this recruiter calls promising you some dream life...
Q: How do I get this form?
A: Well, I've a stack of forms?
Q: Do I need my parents to sign this?
A: No, only you need to sign this--it's not a legal commitment to anything, it just gets you off of the list.

Our school actually gave out the forms once--on report card day. Unfortunately, only about 25% of our parents come to Report Card pick-up. Furthermore, since they are only handed out to the parents in a big stack of forms, only a couple ever come back.

I finished out the Q&A session by asking:
Q: My father is in the Navy, what's wrong with the military? He's proud to serve the country!
A: This is not about being pro or anti-military. It's just about making sure the people who are in the military are people who want to be in the military.

I'm really excited about this--it's not the politics. Sure--it helps that she's informed and active on a vital issue. But it's just exciting to see kids determine for themselves how they think the society should be and take action to make those beliefs into real societal change.

There's a lot more to the "Opt-Out" and counter recruitment movement that deals with the socio-economic and racial inequities of the current recruitment system. If you are interested, check this out:

http://www.themmob.org/lmca/index.html

Please post any comments, especially critical. Thanks!

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Student (and Teacher) Development

I'm teaching full-time in a new environment again this year, so you've probably noticed that my updates are non-existent.

It's always this way--when I have the most interesting stuff going on in my life, I write the least and my experiences are lost to the page. When I'm navel gazing too much, I write a bunch of self-absorbed crap.

So I'm going to try to break through and do a few updates. I'll start with an artificial framework in the hopes it will help me write. Most of all, please respond and chip in you perspective if you can--it will help make me write and even if it fails to do so, I'll certainly learn a lot from it.

Today: Tuesday, only four classes period, eighth was cancelled.

I missed my eighth period kids, but I'm kind of exhausted from that class--it's the one that was twelve students and the kids were blasting through the material and then they dropped 20 extra students into the class with 3 hours notice eleven weeks into the semester.

I'm not really sure how they were supposed to pass, but I've been pretty flexible and there are a small handful that are doing completely awesome. A lot of the students are understandably bitter about the forced add of a foreign language at such a late date, so it's taken some work to get them moving in the right directions.

We had a Student Development team meeting today. I got the memo during my division (homeroom) period, twenty minutes before I had to attend. That kind of threw my planning into disarray, but I'm excited to be on this team.

A couple people from the downtown office came to visit us and solicit grant proposals. It's a good program--for a portion of the grant, teacher proposals are not accepted--the activities must be student written, led and executed. Unfortunately, we don't seem to have students on our student development team, so I was kind of irritated by that. I mean, no matter how many times a bunch of well-meaning teachers meet with each other and chat, there's a point of diminishing returns.

I mean, I feel a strong bond with our students--during division time today, we had an extra half-hour so we watched "Head of State" together, Chris Rock's first film about himself running for president. It has a strong understanding of politics and campaigning, and the kids had a lot of questions about how presidential debates and other aspects of the campaign work. They cheered loudly when Rock's character won, but I didn't point out that Rock had said that he was torn over the ending. Finally, he decided that there might not be another chance to have an African American win a presidential election--real or fictional--for a long time, so he couldn't pass up the chance.

I see that in my kids often--the realization that they are not welcome in the political process and sometimes a "well fuck them if they don't want us!" response that I try my best to explain to them "the best way to mess them up is to get REALLY involved."

So following the meeting, I had a very chaotic hectic day in which the kids were loud and rambunctious, but did seem to get some work done on their projects. I've got them writing fake grant proposals (weird coincidence) in English and then transferring them into Japanese. So I announced about the need for student grants, but there was little interest in trying to import their classwork into the other projects.

During sixth, one of the other teachers came to ask for help on some disciplinary issues. She a great person and a good teacher, but she happens to be caucasian and very sensitive and the kids sometimes just eat her alive. It's kind of hard sometimes to watch someone who cares so much about the kids have to choose between getting a little bit more cynical or bursting into tears or occasionally both. It's been a rough week in general--we had a ton of fights last week and at least two gun incidents, so security has been very tight and I think the kids are a little on edge, doubly so with the break coming up. I've seen a lot more teachers taking kids into the hall to try to deal with them. Technically we can't really send kids out, so there are extreme situations where it's hard to know what to do--a kid has had it rough outside of school and comes to class determined to mess up the entire process. The teachers who don't seem to be stressed out are more "survivors" than experts. There are the great teachers, but it seems like we are mostly judged from the outside just on our classroom discipline, which to be honest, I don't think is really that important. I mean, how many brilliant people do you know who can't sit in their chairs and shut up?

During my "planning periods", I let the students into my room, so they have a safe place to study and avoid the general atmosphere of violence that permeates the school. At first they were concerned that the fighting might spread to my room, but I just explained to them repeatedly that I would step in the way of anyone fighting and if they continued, they would end up punching me in the head.

They tested that promise on a couple of occasions by starting a fake fight and my head was barely spared, but it seemed to satisfy them, so there have been no outbreaks of violence in my classroom.

It does get a little loud sometimes.

Today, I really needed to get some high concentration work done, and I'd heard, "We'll try to be quiet if you don't make us leave" several times to no avail, so I set a limit at 3pm (I was actually done with work at 1:30), and said no talking past that point.

They actually decided to stay and not talk--did some reading and then started to chat a little, but in extremely hushed tones.

I got a ton of work done and at 4:15, I realized that they had stuck to their promise well over an hour, and I had almost finished my grading, so I eavesdropped a little.

They were discussing the upcoming presidential race. "Clinton or Obama, both would be good--the first of their uh, group".

I was a little surprised. Then they proceeded to discuss things that needed to change in the school and how they wished there was something to do.

I smiled, finished my grading, complimented them on their conversation and then tried to sell the grant-writing assignment. They got excited and said they'd have me several ideas for a proposal tomorrow.

I drove my hour commute home, ate my first meal of the day and am now contently rummaging through the day in this space.

Hope someone gets something interesting out of this.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Heroes, Race and Gender

I've been simply shocked by this series.

While “Grey's Anatomy” has spent most of the season wallowing in the main character's plot line of "Whom should I date today and what superficial reason should I use to justify that?" “Heroes” has emerged as the best show on TV for the growing minority of us not petrified by three-dimensional minority characters.

That's not to say that non-racialized casting is the main reason to watch the show. It's actually a synergy between the thoughtful casting and brilliant writing that neither insults the viewer's intelligence nor falls into stereotyping and caricaturization of the principals.

Masi Oka is utterly brilliant as Hiro, the courageous, implacable hero of space and time, as he must portray both Otaku Hiro and Future Hiro, the sword wielding “hindsight is 20/20” guide of the expedition to save the world.

Sendhil Ramamurthy plays steamy narrator Mohinder Suresh, who tries to bring the Heroes together by following his father’s eccentric path that led to his eventual death.

Heroes’ only flaw is its weak female representation. The main female characters sound like a roll call of Hollywood stereotypes: the stripper, the cheerleader, mysterious drug addict or stripper turned bad actress, the cheating wife, and the handicapped wife being cheated upon. The only bright lights have been the development of the cheerleader, who thankfully is not played by a twenty-five year old with big tits, and the most well developed female role, the dreaming waitress, who after being developed more in her first twenty minutes onscreen than all of the other women combined was summarily executed by the serial killer.

Well, despite some notable exceptions, comics are not known for their good gender portrayals. For an utterly amazing, analytical look at this issue, please stop reading my blog and read “Women in Refrigerators”; an very thoughtful critique of gender in comic books that also tries to give artists the opportunity to respond to the analysis.


This blog entry approaches a much wider issue of how we tailor our perspective on existing trends to serve our own racial stereotypes and fabricate biological explanations to suit them:


This is fascinating to me because of two things:
1) Writers must balance their own politics with their audience’s tastes and agenda.
2) Many writers totally suck at assessing their audience’s tastes and agenda.

Looking at Heroes, the weakest actors, with the exception of Adrian Pasdar, tend to be the Caucasian American ones. Milo Ventimiglia is just dreadfully casted as his smirkiness is completely out of character for the bashful little brother character, and Ali Lartner manages to command BOTH of the worst two performances on the show as “Nikki” and her sister “Jessica”.

But was this a good call?

People magazine has Ventimiglia polling as the “most sexy” character far outpacing the minority stars.

Overall, I think this just illustrates how complex the issues of race and gender in media are. The public accepts a show that studio execs promised us they would not: one with minority male leads and non-English language dialogue. But their definitions of “sexy” still tend to be narrowly confined by the stereotypical conceptions of race and gender.

As MLK said, “I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, except in terms of ‘sexiness’ in which case, color of skin is absolutely vital!”

Wow, this post ended somewhere entirely different from where I intended, but I do think in a good place. Let me leave you with this quote from Joan Hilty's response to "Women in Refrigerators" which sums up not only the issues of gender in hero mythology, but also the greater cultural war of so-called "anti-PC-ness" and the fight to restore white male supremacy:

Really, the larger reality is that American mainstream comics, built by guys for guys on the crumbling foundations of superhero fantasy, remain intensely hostile to women, consciously and subconsciously. As political and cultural landscapes shift and evolve worldwide and it gets harder and harder for white guys to retain their perceived right to run the world, you can see the frustration act itself out in various forms of hideous backlash -- everything from "Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire?" to Katma Tui.

Anyway, check out “Heroes”—the writing is incredible, and the plot twists are not the usual Hollywood, “I just made some shit up that doesn’t make any sense, but you didn’t see it coming!” variety.

Sunday, November 12, 2006

Veterans Day

Happy Veterans Day! Today let us celebrate the dignity of someone willing to risk their own life for the principles they believe in and the good of others.

Let us honor them in a way that as a society we have neglected--let us show respect that is concrete and meaningful rather than purely symbolic. Let's toss out the flag displays and American flag cakes, and towels and bikini bottoms and actually show love for our veterans.

Let's open our ears and listen to the stories of the veterans rather than just use them as puppets for our own polemical agendas. Let us learn from the stories of those who feel vindicated from their time in Iraq and also from those who feel cheated by our civilian government and its policies. Let us respect those who loved every moment of war and those who were shooken and horrified by their experience. Let us respond lovingly and strongly to all of our veterans' experience whether they be uplifting or truely horrifying:
The story of Juan Torres

I tend to editorialize at this point, but I really cannot express myself on this account.
We are facing a two-faced society that claims to support its best and brightest (and poorest) as it sends them to war, and then betrays them in the most disgusting ways imaginable. Please read and make your own decisions. Then if you want to know what to do next, respond in comments and we'll discuss it.

Sunday, September 03, 2006

Oops, I'm a privileged asshole, "my bad"!

I've always despised the phrase "my bad". I remember the initial wars between "my bag" and "my bad" and I don't think most people ever really understood the deep difference between the two.

Both are used in approximately the same situation--you fuck something up that affects other people, so you say, "My bad" or "My bag".

The difference is that "my bad" is commonly used as an end to the situation. "I fucked up, hee hee, let's change the subject!" "My bag" is short for "my baggage". It means, "I'm sorry, it's my burden and I'll make up for it later!"

I think it shows a deep cultural division in our society. "My bad" is dripping in social privilege. It says, "I fuck up, but when I fuck up, we laugh about it and move on! I don't owe anybody anything. I'm special!" "My bag" is a working-class, "I earn my way" mentality. "When I fuck up, I acknowledge the impact I've had on others and I genuinely strive to make it up to them."

Where did "my bag" originate? I don't have any specific entymological data, but from my experience, I first heard it on the court during predominantly African-American sporting events. "My bad" was a misheard derivative that caught fire in the mainstream white adolescent community. It gained huge popularity when it was included, ironically enough, in the film "Clueless".

To this day, I have no idea whether Amy Heckling, the writer/director of "Clueless" knew the difference between the two phrases. Even if she did, it made perfect logical sense to use "my bad" in the script that she wrote. These were clueless privileged adolescents, so it fit the situation perfectly.

So what does that make the rest of the millions of people who then decided to make the phrase their catch phrase?

Thursday, August 31, 2006

Taking one for the team!

A kind reader responded to my post supporting the profiling of flyers for our safety with this crafty response:

Anonymous said...

Have there been any recent incidents where a white person wanted a Chinese person off of a plane? What about a Mexican? What about an (non-Muslim) African ?

You're making this into a "white people are racist" thing, but the evidence doesn't seem to support that view. It seems that white people, and various colors of people for that matter, are nervous when people who look like they follow the "religion of peace" are on their plane.



Dear Anonymous:

Yes, actually, I was almost kicked off of a flight out of Islip because my penis was too big to fit in my seat. My penis is actually pretty small, but they had assumed that I have a giant cock because of my Chinese ancestry. Kelly Hu was sitting next to me on that flight, but she said nothing. As part of my drug trafficking operation, I employ a number of Mexican people to fly on planes for me, but they actually haven't had any trouble as O'Hare officials were too interested in strip-searching random African-American women at customs.

With your second paragraph, I have no idea what you are talking about. I am in FAVOR of tossing people off of planes because they are too Muslim. I just don't think most people are as clever as those crafty Brits, who could tell just by the way the colored gentlemen were checking their watches that they were bombing for Allah.

Hell, I get nervous too. One time there was this really fat white guy who got on my plane, and I love white people, but I was seriously nervous that his enormous girth would cause the plane to crash into the ocean. I mean it's a scientific principle that planes can't carry infinite weight. The evidence supports this. I'm not a racist--some of my best friends are fat white people, and have even had them over to my house (never for dinner though--I'm not made of money). I just wouldn't want one to marry my daughter.

But what kind of country do we live in? Why can't I have fat people thrown off the plane because they make me nervous?

It gets worse. I'm deathly afraid whenever I see Jewish people with their yamakas board the planes. After all, those evil brown people are always trying to blow up Jewish people, and it's not like you can just blow up part of a plane.

I tell the stewardess, I mean flight attendant (I'm not a sexist), "Could you please remove that Jewish person from the plane because I fear for my life?!" and they look at me like I'm crazy.

I realize that it's not the Jewish people's fault that they are targets. But as Jonah Goldberg has taught me, sometimes some people different from us have to make huge sacrifices for our safety while we make no sacrifices ourselves. So if it was up to me, it'd be no Jewish people on planes or in public EVER!

Can't they just stay in secret compartments somewhere where the terrorists would never find them? I read part of a book about that once about this girl who successfully hid from the evil Nazis (I think they were Muslims too) in a secret compartment and it saved her family. At least that's how I remember it--I didn't get to finish the Cliff's Notes because that awesome 90210 "Rave" episode was on TV, and I just had to catch it.

Because see that's what America is all about--other people giving up stuff for the greater benefit, and by "greater benefit", I of course mean "my benefit", Sure, there are tons of peaceful Muslims in my community who always treat me well, and I think they should be honored to be thrown off a plane or have their faith ridiculed by my Anonymous friends and their condescending quotation marks after all, they are helping America--a land that they love. It may be an abusive, "I love him even though he beats me" kind of love, but who am I to judge love. Unless they are sodomities, in which case I am the perfect person to judge love negatively.

Anyway, I'm sorry for the confusion. If only I could write clearly and concisely like that man I so admire, Mr. Goldberg, He has shown me that just because your people have been the victims of horrible injustices doesn't mean that you can't preach for further injustices to be visited on others. What a brave, articulate man.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Book Burning

Who needs a bonfire when you have satire?

All the fun, none of the oppression of speech!
Listed on 
BlogShares